Preliminary Results from a Deep‐water Ecological Acoustic Recorder (EAR) Deployed off NW Ni‘i hau during RIMPAC‐2010

Two ecological acoustic recorders (EARs) were deployed on July 17, 2010, one at a depth of 800 meters (m) off the northwest coast (21° 59.613' N, 160° 12.167' W), and the other at a depth of 16 m off the southeast coast of Ni'ihau (21° 47.306' N, 160° 11.964' W). These two sites were selected by personnel from the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific to provide acoustic data during the 2010 Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise in the Hawaii Range Complex.

Ecological acoustic recorders (EARs) have been deployed at several locations in Hawaii and in other western Pacific locations to study the foraging behavior of deep-diving odontocetes. EARs have been deployed at depths greater than 400 m at five locations around the island of Kauai, one at Ni’ihau, two around the island of Okinawa, and four in the Marianas (two close to island of Guam, one close to the island of Saipan and another close to the island of Tinian).

Fifteen aerial surveys (72,647 km) occurred during 2008-2012 to monitor occurrence, abundance, and behavior of marine mammals in the Southern California Bight (SCB) on behalf of the U.S. Navy. Thirty-six (2%) of 2,151 total sightings of at least 11 species were mixed-species associations (i.e., at least two different species swimming together/interacting). Little is known about these associations. Risso’s dolphins were most frequently associated with another marine mammal species (19 [7%] of 238 total Risso’s sightings) as follows: with sperm whales (1x), California sea lions (CaSL) (3x), and bottlenose (7x), northern right whale (NRWD) (4x), long-beaked common (1x), unidentified (1x), and common dolphin sp. (2x). Up to 3 species occurred together on 3 different occasions: (1) sperm whales/Risso’s/NRW dolphins, (2) Risso’s/unidentified dolphins/CaSL, and (3) Pacific white-sided/common dolphins with CaSL. The most unusual mixed species sighting was 24 sperm whales (including 4 calves) with 11 Risso’s and ~50 NRW dolphins: Risso’s repeatedly charged adult sperm whales’ heads who responded by dropping their lower jaw, perhaps related to kleptoparasitism. Potential reasons for mixed-species associations include increased protection from predators via dilution, increased prey detection/consumption, and “play” (i.e., fin whale calf touching NRWD). Data include interactions not previously documented in the SCB among these socially complex animal groups.

Effects of mixed-species associations (MSA [at least two different species swimming together and / or inte racting]) on cetacean behavior rarely have been quantified, but are important for identifying and differentiating potential anthropogenic impacts . Baseline marine mammal behavior was assessed during 83 ,005 km of U.S. Navy supported aerial line-transect surveys in the Southern California Bight during 2008-2013.

This study investigates mixed-species associations among marine mammals in the Southern California Bight, focusing specifically on Risso's dolphins (Grampus griseus). Over a six-year period, aerial surveys were conducted to record the frequency and nature of these associations, revealing that Risso's dolphins were the most commonly observed species in mixed interactions. The results indicate a significant decline in the proportion of Risso's dolphins involved in such associations compared to historical records, possibly due to an increase in their relative abundance. The findings underline the importance of monitoring mixed-species associations to understand marine mammal dynamics and ecological interactions.

This work builds upon and complements longer-term studies of movements and site fidelity of both Cuvier’s beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris) and short-finned pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus) off the North Carolina coast using photo-identification (photo-ID)

This work builds upon and complements longer-term studies of movements and site fidelity of both Cuvier’s beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris) and short-finned pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus) off the North Carolina coast using photo-identification (photo-ID)

The overall goal of this study was to include the 2018 survey data in the previous 1991–2014 modeling dataset in order to improve SMDs for the CCE study area. Specific objectives included: Generating multi-year average density surfaces for the Navy and others to use in their long-term (2–7 year) environmental planning efforts; and Providing updated abundance and “minimum population size (Nmin)” estimates as defined in the Guidelines for Assessing Marine Mammal Stocks (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2016).

The Hawaiian Islands Cetacean and Ecosystem Assessment Survey (HICEAS) 2017 was conducted in waters within the United States (U.S.) Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) around the Hawaiian Archipelago (henceforth “Hawaiian EEZ” for brevity) from 6 July through 1 December 2017 (Yano et al. 2018). The primary objective of this line-transect survey was to collect cetacean sighting data to support the derivation of cetacean density estimates using both design-based analyses and habitat modeling techniques.

Rapid progress and affordability of photographic technology with increasing improvements in image resolution have facilitated advancements in efficiency and alternative approaches in data collection for marine mamma ls. We report these recent improvements by comparing marine mammal photographs taken during 2008-2013 aerial surveys of 16 marine mammal species in the Southern California Bight, shore-based studies of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Galveston Bay, Texas (2011 - 2013), and gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) off Sakhalin Island, Russia (2004 -2010).

The Hawaiian Islands Cetacean and Ecosystem Assessment Survey (HICEAS) is a recurring ship-based, line-transect survey designed to estimate cetacean abundance in the entirety of the Hawaiian EEZ.

Aerial surveys provide a valuable platform to record and document behavior of marine mammals above and below the sea surface. This approach is advantageous in avoiding disturbance from the observational platform while circling outside the sound cone of the plane. Since 2008, the U.S. Navy has instituted a marine mammal monitoring program in southern California from several platforms, including aerial surveys, and has successfully captured previously undocumented behaviors and species interactions during the aerial effort. This included focal behavioral interactions between sperm whales, northern right whale dolphins, and Risso's dolphins on 14 May 2011, 24 nm west of San Diego, CA. This -1.5-hour encounter was documented in detail with high- definition digital photographs and video as the group traveled NE along the edge of a steep underwater drop-off. Risso's dolphins initiated charges towards the heads of the sperm whales on multiple occasions, followed by fast retreats. Sperm whale adults responded by displaying an open lower jaw. Risso's dolphins appeared to direct this behavior only toward adult sperm whales that had recently surfaced from long (> 20 min) dives; it was not directed toward the four calves in the group. Northern right whale dolphins intermingled with the Risso's dolphins and sperm whales, although they did not approach sperm whales as closely or abruptly as the Risso's dolphins. While similar apparently aggressive Risso's dolphin behavior has been documented toward other cetacean species, this is the first known occurrence of head-on charging by Risso's dolphins, accompanied by the elicited jaw display response from sperm whales. The interaction may be similar to aggressive pilot whales behavior towards sperm whales, and may function in acquiring regurgitated sperm whale food, or other needs by the Risso's dolphins.

Cetacean distribution, density and abundance in the Southern California Bight were assessed through visual and acoustic surveys during five California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) cruises from August 2012-November 2013. Visual monitoring incorporated standard line-transect protocol during all daylight transits while acoustic monitoring employed a towed hydrophone array during transits and sonobuoys at oceanographic sampling stations. Visual effort included 584 observation hours covering 10,900 kilometers yielding 565 sightings of 15 identified cetacean species.

Spatial and temporal distribution patterns, density and abundance of cetaceans in the southern California Bight were assessed through visual and acoustic surveys during five California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) cruises from August 2011 – July 2012. Visual monitoring incorporated standard line-transect protocol during all daylight transits while acoustic monitoring employed a towed hydrophone array during transits and sonobuoys at oceanographic sampling stations.

This report summarizes small boat based research conducted on cetaceans off southern California by the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) in collaboration with Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC) from August 2009 – July 2010. The primary objectives of this research were to use sighting, photo-identification, biopsy and acoustical sampling techniques to assess the occurrence, distribution and population structure of small cetaceans in a region that is subject to frequent naval exercises; this information is needed to evaluate possible effects from Mid Frequency Active Sonar (MFAS) trials and ultimately for the development of appropriate management protocols.

A combination of machine learning and expert analyst review was used to detect odontocete echolocation clicks, identify dominant click types, and classify clicks in 32 years of acoustic data collected at 11 autonomous monitoring sites in the western North Atlantic between 2016 and 2019. Previously-described click types for eight known odontocete species or genera were identified in this data set: Blainville’s beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris), Cuvier’s beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris), Gervais’ beaked whales (Mesoplodon europaeus), Sowerby’s beaked whales (Mesoplodon bidens), and True’s beaked whales (Mesoplodon mirus), Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus), and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus)

This project is intended to provide baseline information on the species composition, density, distribution, and basic behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present within the United States (U.S.) Navy’s Virginia Capes (VACAPES) Operating Area (OPAREA). This study is part of a larger, multi-institutional, marine mammal and sea turtle monitoring program of U.S. Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast and Gulf of Mexico supporting Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing (AFTT)

This report represents one facet of a collaborative multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast.

This report forms part of a multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density, and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast.

This report forms part of a multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density, and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast.

This report forms part of a multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast

This report forms part of a multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density, and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted to detect the presence of marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds in the Navy’s Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC) from September 14, 2012 until June 30, 2013. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at the shelf slope near Quinault Canyon. Data analysis methods consisted of detection of sounds by analyst scans of long-term spectral averages (LTSAs) and spectrograms, and by automated computer algorithms when possible. The data were divided into three frequency bands for analysis of marine mammal vocalizations and anthropogenic sounds.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Gulf of Alaska Temporary Maritime Activities Area (GATMAA) from June 2013 to May 2014 to detect marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at five locations: a shelf site offshore Kenai Peninsula (200 m depth, site CA), a continental slope site in deep water (850 m depth, site CB), a slope site offshore Kodiak Island (230 m depth, site KO), a deep offshore site at Pratt Seamount (1000 m depth, site PT), and a deep offshore site at Quinn Seamount (930 m depth, site QN).

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex from December 2012 to January 2014 to detect marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at three locations: near Santa Barbara Island (880 m), west of San Clemente Island (1000 m), and southwest of San Clemente Island (1300 m). Six baleen whale species were recorded: blue whales, Bryde’s whales, fin whales, gray whales, humpback whales, and minke whales.

To monitor for the presence of marine mammals, High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) were deployed at two sites within the Navy’s Virginia Capes Range Complex. There were three deployments at one site, located offshore from Cape Hatteras (HAT), between October 2012 and December 2014. There was one deployment at the other site, located offshore from Norfolk Canyon (NFC), between June 2014 and April 2015. Both sites were located approximately 75 nmi offshore in about 1000 m of water.

High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) were deployed from May 2013 to August 2014 to detect marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds in the Navy’s Jacksonville Range Complex. The HARPs recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at a site located 60 nm east off the Florida coastline on the continental shelf. Technical malfunctions resulted in loss of data for the period from June 8, 2013 through February 16, 2014. Data analysis consisted of analyst scans of long-term spectral averages (LTSAs) and spectrograms, and automated computer algorithm detection when possible. Three frequency bands were analyzed for marine mammal vocalizations and anthropogenic sounds: (1) Low-frequency, between 10300 Hz, (2) Mid-frequency, between 10-5,000 Hz, and (3) High-frequency, between 1-100 kHz. Three baleen whale species were detected: fin whales, humpback whales, and minke whales. Fin whale detections were limited to February 2014. Humpback whale calls were detected from February to June 2014 with a peak in March 2014. Minke whales were detected in late-February through March 2014. An additional sound called the 5-pulse signal, presumably from a baleen whale, was detected from February to September 2014, with a peak in July. One known odontocete species was detected, Risso’s dolphins, which were detected in low numbers in July 2014. Odontocete signals that could not be distinguished to species were common throughout the recordings. However, eight distinct click types of unknown species origin were found to be present (CT 17, CT 22, CT 25, CT 26, CT 27, CT 27A, CT 30 and CT32). The following anthropogenic sounds were detected: broadband ship noise, Mid-Frequency Active (MFA) sonar, and echosounders. Broadband ships were common throughout the recordings with a peak in detections in May 2014. MFA sonar was detected during all months with recordings, with a peak in June 2013. Echosounder pings were prevalent throughout the recordings.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted at two sites in the US Navy’s Jacksonville Range Complex during August 2010 – July 2011. These sites are located 50 and 61 nm east of the Florida coastline on the shelf and shelf break at water depths of 40 m – 90 m. Acoustic data collected at these sites provide information on the presence of marine mammals and anthropogenic sound sources. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) documented sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with recording cycles of 5 minutes every 15 minutes. The data were divided into three frequency bands and data analysis was conducted with analyst scans of long-term spectral averages and spectrograms. Four mysticete whale species were recorded: fin, minke, sei, and humpback. No blue whale, North Atlantic right whale, or Bryde’s whale calls detected. A new call, designated the “5-pulse” was detected and is presumed to be produced by a mysticete whale due to its character, prevalence and intensity. Site A has more hours with calling mysticete whales than site B. However, humpback whale calls were detected only at site B, though these detections were few. The largest number of odontocete detections were attributed to unidentified odontocetes, thought to be primarily bottlenose and Atlantic spotted dolphins. Unidentified odontocetes were detected throughout the year. Overall numbers of detections were higher at site A than site B. There was a diel acoustic activity pattern with greater numbers of echolocation clicks produced at night, likely due to nighttime foraging. Risso’s dolphin echolocation clicks were only detected at site A and only occurred August through March. Five click types, yet to be associated to an odontocete species, were characterized and their seasonal and diel occurrence described. Ship noise was the most common anthropogenic sound at both sites A and B. Both sites had Mid-Frequency Active (MFA) sonar events throughout the period of data collection. At site A, a total of 2,437 MFA sonar pings were detected with a maximum peak-to-peak received level of 173 dB re 1 μPa. Similarly, a total of 2,496 MFA sonar pings were detected at site B, reaching a maximum peak-to-peak level of 166 dB re 1 μPa. Echosounder pings with a variety of primary frequencies (4 – 80 kHz) were found at both sites A and B. Explosions were recorded at both sites, though were more prevalent at site B. A low-frequency tone, referred to as the 130 Hz tone, was recorded at site A. High noise levels, possibly caused by instrument strumming and fluid flow at the sensor, occurred intermittently at both sites and likely decreased the detection range for low-frequency sounds.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between August 2010 and February 2011 in the Jacksonville, FL, survey area at Site A in 90 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 153 days between 26 August 2010 and 25 January 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Risso’s dolphins, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data. A new call type, the “5-pulse” call, presumed to be produced by a mysticete, was also detected in the data.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted within the Navy’s Cherry Point OPAREA during August – December 2011 and July – October 2012 for a total of 105 and 81 days respectively. This site is located approximately 100 miles from the North Carolina coastline on the shelf break. The 2011 deployment was at a water depth of 952 m and the 2012 deployment was at a water depth of 914 m. Acoustic data collected at this site provide information on the presence of marine mammals and anthropogenic sound sources. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with recording cycles of 5 minutes every 10 minutes. The data were divided into three frequency bands and data were analyzed by scans of long-term spectral averages and spectrograms. Four baleen whale species were recorded: blue, fin, minke, and sei whales. The detections of their calls were made between late August and early December 2011. Blue whale calls were the only baleen whale call type detected in the 2012 deployment. No Bryde’s, humpback, or North Atlantic right whale calls were detected in either deployment. Several different toothed whale species were recorded: Blainville’s, Cuvier’s, and Gervais’ beaked whales, killer whales, pygmy or dwarf sperm whales (Kogia spp.), Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified odontocetes. All species except killer whales were recorded in 2011 and 2012. Killer whales were detected only in 2011. Ship noise was the most common anthropogenic sound in both deployments. MFA was noted during both deployments. A total of 391 pings were detected in 2011 with a maximum peak-to-peak received level of 156 dB re 1 μPa. In 2012, a total of 492 pings were detected with a maximum peak-to-peak received level of 167 dB re 1 μPa. Few echosounder pings over a variety of frequencies (4-80 kHz) were detected during both deployments. Explosions were detected in both deployments, though they were more prevalent in 2011 than 2012. High noise levels, possibly caused by instrument strumming and fluid flow at the sensor, occurred intermittently in both deployments and likely decreased the detection range for low-frequency sounds. This strumming was most prevalent in 2012.

Navy Research Funded Year Three Project Reports

This document contains amplifying technical data and information for the United States Department of the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex Comprehensive Monitoring Report.

Whales and dolphins use sound for different functions including echolocation and social communication, and thus changes in sound production patterns are a likely component of any behavioral response to anthropogenic sounds such as military mid-frequency sonar (MFA). To simultaneously log whale and dolphin movements, sound production and reception, and anthropogenic sound exposure levels, we used Dtags (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution) and bioacoustic probes (Greeneridge Sciences). Tags were deployed on wild, free-ranging cetaceans in Southern California waters. Tagged animals were then exposed to simulated MFA or, as a control, pseudo-random noise (PRN). In total, the August-September 2010 SoCal10 behavioral response study included 28 playbacks: 19 to blue whales (11 MFA, 8 PRN), 5 to fin whales (3 MFA, 2 PRN), 2 to a single sperm whale (1 MFA, 1 PRN), 1 to a Risso’s dolphin (MFA), and 1 to a Cuvier’s beaked whale (MFA). For this analysis we focus first on baleen whale call production and reception rates (particularly blue whale D calls and variable calls) in relation to sound exposure level, dive behavior, and lunge feeding rates. We then examine echolocation-based foraging behavior and social call production by the toothed whales as a function of sound exposure level. This rich dataset, including multiple cetacean species of conservation concern, provides insight into the wide potential range of responses to sound, and the dependence of those responses on ecological, social and behavioral context. Investigations like SoCal10 can help guide inferences for related topics, such as assessment of population effects of anthropogenic noise.

In the Pacific, the Marine Mammal Monitoring on Navy Ranges (M3R) program maintains systems that continuously run algorithms to detect, classify and localize marine mammals year-round on the U.S. Navy’s deep-water Southern California Antisubmarine Warfare Range (SOAR) in Southern California and the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) off Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i. Long-term archive data collected on these ranges allow for numerous types of studies on species inhabiting the ranges, including the monitoring of abundance, behavioral responses to naval activities, and habitat usage. They also provide the opportunity to study ambient sound levels and soundscapes. In FY24 the M3R program had five goals for SOAR and PMRF: Support real-time monitoring of on-water tagging operations Collection and postprocessing of M3R binary archives and periodic broadband recordings Data preservation: conversion of Alesis recordings to M3R packet recorder format SOAR Continuous Active Sonar Behavioral Response Study (CAS BRS) DICASS sonobuoy receiver adaption in preparation for deployment at SOAR.

In the Pacific, the Marine Mammal Monitoring on Navy Ranges (M3R) program maintains systems that continuously run algorithms to detect, classify and localize marine mammals year-round on the U.S. Navy’s deep-water Southern California Antisubmarine Warfare Range (SOAR) in Southern California and the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) off Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i. Long-term archive data collected on these ranges allow for numerous types of studies on species inhabiting the ranges, including the monitoring of abundance, behavioral responses to naval activities, and habitat usage. They also provide the opportunity to study ambient sound levels and soundscapes.

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions: Which cetacean species occur within the VACAPES OPAREA off Virginia, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally? What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area? Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years? What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes? Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily move through areas of U.S. Navy live-fire or Anti-Submarine Warfare training events?

The United States (U.S.) Navy routinely conducts training and testing activities in the Virginia Capes (VACAPES) Operating Area (OPAREA) off the mid-Atlantic and Southeast U.S. The region encompassing the deeper waters of the continental shelf, shelf break, and continental slope has been recognized as an important habitat for multiple species of cetaceans. Kenney and Winn (1986) showed that the shelf edge from Cape Hatteras to Georges Bank was the second most intensively used cetacean habitat off the northeastern U.S. based on 3 years of surveys conducted by the Cetacean and Turtle Assessment Program (CETAP 1982). This progress report includes all offshore monitoring activities conducted in 2021. The goals of this effort focus on addressing fundamental information gaps related to marine mammal occurrence, exposure, and response as identified by the U.S. Navy’s Integrated Comprehensive Monitoring Program (DoN 2010) and recommendations provided by a Scientific Advisory Group review (DoN 2011).

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013b), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions:  Which cetacean species occur over the outer continental shelf to the east of NSN, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally?  What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area?  Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years?  What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes?  Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013b), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions:  Which cetacean species occur over the outer continental shelf to the east of NSN, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally?  What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area?  Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years?  What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes?  Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013b), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions:  Which cetacean species occur over the outer continental shelf to the east of NSN, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally?  What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area?  Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years?  What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes?  Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013b), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions:  Which cetacean species occur over the outer continental shelf to the east of NSN, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally?  What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area?  Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years?  What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes?  Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance

Results from the second year of a three-year project investigating the distribution, demographics, and behavior of cetaceans in the US Navy’s Southern California operational area are summarized. Eighteen small vessel surveys for cetaceans, which included species verification tests in conjunction with M3R (Marine Mammal Monitoring on Navy Undersea Ranges) acoustic monitoring at the Southern California Anti-submarine Warfare Range (SOAR), as well as photo-identification, satellite tagging, and biopsy sampling of species of interest, were conducted in July 2011 and January and March 2012. 112 groups of 14 cetacean species were encountered. Twenty-one satellite tags, some depth reporting, were deployed on four species, with an emphasis on Cuvier’s beaked and fin whales. Among other findings, preliminary results of photo-identification studies combined with results from satellite tag data suggest that both Cuvier’s beaked whales and fin whales may have population sub-units with higher than expected residency to the Southern California Bight. Beaked whales particularly show this higher than expected residency to SOAR.

In order to address requirements under the Marine Mammal Protection Act Letters of Authorization permitted to the U.S. Navy, three U.S. Navy civilian marine mammal observers (MMOs; Ms. Amy Farak, Ms. Julie Rivers, and Dr. Robert Uyeyama) and one U.S. Navy contractor (Dr. Thomas A. Jefferson) participated in two consecutive ASW exercise events in the Hawaii Range Complex from 15‐22 February, 2011 (Figure 1). These MMOs were stationed aboard a U.S. Navy destroyer, hereafter referred to as DDG‐D. The goals of the monitoring and this study were to: 1. Collect data to assess the effectiveness of the Navy lookout team. 2. Obtain data to characterize the possible exposure of marine species to mid‐frequency active sonar (MFAS). 3. Achieve close coordination between the contracted aerial survey team, Navy aircraft on the range, range control, and th

This report forms part of a multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. 5 Atlantic coast.

This report describes results of vessel surveys from a multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density, and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast.

This report summarizes the aerial survey effort conducted at the JAX site from 2009 through 2017. The monitoring project was intended to provide information on the species composition, density, and spatial distribution of marine mammals and sea turtles present in Navy’s JAX operating area (OPAREA), with particular focus on the intended site of the USWTR. These aerial surveys extended over nine years and yielded a very detailed seasonal picture of the occurrence, distribution and abundance of marine mammals and sea turtles in the region. This work also provides an important baseline against which future changes in the marine mammal and sea turtle fauna can be assessed.

This report describes results from a multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast. This program began in 2007, with baseline aerial and vessel surveys and a passive acoustic monitoring program in Onslow Bay, North Carolina, and has since expanded to include study areas off Jacksonville, Florida and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina.

This report forms part of a multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic coast. The program began in 2007, with baseline aerial and vessel surveys and a passive acoustic monitoring program in Onslow Bay, North Carolina, and has since expanded to include study areas off Jacksonville, Florida, and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. Off Cape Hatteras, four years of surveys have provided information on the complex patterns of distribution and diversity of the marine mammals and sea turtles in this highly productive area. The current report builds on this past body of work and describes activities conducted during both the Deep Divers and Satellite Tagging projects conducted off Cape Hatteras between January and December 2014. This constitutes the second year of the Deep Divers project, which focuses on the distribution and ecology of several deep-diving odontocete species, including: beaked whale (Cuvier’s beaked whale: Ziphius cavirostris and Mesoplodon spp.); short-finned pilot whale (Globicephala macrorhynchus); and sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus). To achieve a more robust picture of the medium-term movement patterns of these and other odontocete cetaceans in the Cape Hatteras survey area, we began a satellite tagging project during the reporting period. Satellite tagging effort and associated sightings are presented here; preliminary analyses of movement data are available in a separate report generated by the Cascadia Research Collective (see Baird et al. 2015). All survey effort in the Cape Hatteras study site this year was dedicated to Deep Divers and Satellite Tagging projects, so we also report ongoing photographic identification work for this area in this report.

A multi-institutional marine protected species monitoring program involving aerial, vessel and acoustic surveillance techniques was implemented at the proposed Undersea Warfare Training Range (USWTR) offshore of Jacksonville, Florida in January 2009. Visual surveys, in conjunction with acoustic sampling methods, have been conducted to investigate cetacean and sea turtle occurrence, distribution and abundance. Through December 2012 a total of 722 aerial tracklines (60687 km) were flown, resulting in 641 cetacean sightings, encompassing 8079 individuals. Tursiops truncatus and Stenella frontalis were the most frequently encountered, followed by Grampus griseus, Globicephala macrorhynchus, Balaenoptera acutorostrata, Steno bredanensis, Eubalaena glacialis, Megaptera novaeangliae, Physeter macrocephalus, and Kogia spp. Cetaceans were encountered 126 times during the 3403 km of vessel surveys, totaling 950 individuals. Sightings consisted of S. frontalis, T. truncatus, G. macrorhynchus, and G. griseus. Across all visual platforms, T. truncatus were encountered throughout the range, whereas S. frontalis, S. bredanensis, and E. glacialis were recorded exclusively in shelf waters. All other species were detected only in pelagic waters. The towed passive acoustic array was deployed during 21 vessel surveys, generating 24.2 hours of recordings, detecting all four sighted species. High frequency acoustic recording packages (HARPs) were deployed at two sites in the study area for long‐term passive acoustic monitoring. The HARP data have been analyzed for diel, seasonal, and interannual trends in cetacean occurrence. Surveys are scheduled to continue in order to asses long‐term habitat usage patterns in the USWTR.

To monitor for the presence of marine mammals, a High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) recorded within the Navy’s Virginia Capes Range Complex, offshore from Cape Hatteras (HAT), between April 2015 and January 2016. The HAT site was located approximately 75 nm offshore in about 1000 m of water.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) was deployed from August 2014 to July 2015, with recordings made between August 2014 and May 2015, to detect marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds in the Navy’s Jacksonville Range Complex. The HARP was located 83 nm off the Florida coastline on the continental slope.

In order to support the U.S. Navy in meeting regulatory requirements for monitoring established under the Final Rules and to provide a mechanism to assist with coordination of program objectives under the ICMP, this survey was conducted to confirm the Marine Mammal Monitoring on Navy Ranges (M3R) acoustic detections and marine mammal satellite tagging was prior to a training event, the Submarine Commander’s Course exercise, which would be conducted in the same area during February 2012.This report presents the methods and preliminary results of a vessel-based visual and acoustic survey effort that was conducted in conjunction with a tagging and species-validation project

The overall objective of the ICMP is to assimilate relevant data collected across U.S. Navy range complexes in order to answer questions pertaining to the impact of MFAS and explosives on marine mammals and sea turtles.

The first phase to integrate the historical sum of these U.S. Navy-sponsored visual survey efforts for marine species monitoring in the HRC was prepared by Uyeyama (2011). This report represents the second phase of that effort and presents an overview of monitoring survey effort to date in the HRC. Available data from visual surveys performed by both contractor-led efforts and U.S. Navy in-house surveys was compiled and processed in order to: 1. Create a geographic information system (GIS)-based summation of all survey tracks that can be easily visualized. 2. Construct a geo-referenced database of sightings that can be queried by species, observer platform, Beaufort Sea State (BSS), season, or other sighting/survey variables. 3. Conduct an enhanced analysis of sighting success with respect to survey platform, field protocol, and environmental conditions. 4. Inform and adjust data collection procedures on future surveys as needed to reflect lessons learned from sighting data compilation efforts presented here. 5. Provide information to enhance informed management of marine protected species in the HRC and support the adaptive management process that is part of the ICM

This report presents a geographic information system (GIS)-based overview of the sighting records obtained during marine species monitoring effort (a total of 12 U.S. Pacific Fleet-funded surveys) to date in the MIRC. Also included are incidental marine mammal and sea turtle sightings made since 1965 on non-dedicated surveys in the region.

Beaked whales (Family Ziphiidae; Order Cetacea) are the least well-described group of marine mammals because they conduct very long deep dives, spend little time on the surface where they display cryptic behavior, and are difficult to identify due to the similarity between species. Beaked whales are also known to be susceptible to high-energy sound sources in the ocean (e.g. seismic research, sonars used by military activities).

This report summarizes work conducted in FY2009-FY2010 with Navy support to characterize marine mammal sounds related to passive acoustic monitoring in the Hawaii Range Complex (HRC). Existing acoustic data from the Hawaii Range Complex area were analyzed to provide better descriptions of acoustic signals by species.

Marine mammal surveys, initiated as part of the CalCOFI cruises in 2004, were continued during 2016-2017. Visual monitoring incorporated standard line-transect survey protocol which includes two experienced observers scanning for marine mammals during transits between CalCOFI stations.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex during May 2011 – March 2012 to detect the presence of marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds. Highfrequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with nearly continuous temporal coverage at a site near Santa Barbara Island (site M) and at a site west of San Clemente Island (site H). Data analysis consisted of detection of sounds of interest by analyst scans of long-term spectral averages and spectrograms, and by automated computer algorithm detection when possible. Representative sounds are presented in this report, as well as details of the computer algorithms used to detect them.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted at two sites in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex during April 2010 – April 2011. These data provide information on the presence of marine mammals and anthropogenic sound sources. High‐frequency acoustic recording packages documented sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with nearly continuous temporal coverage at a site near Santa Barbara Island (site M) and a site south of San Clemente Island (site N). For this reporting period, 8,099 hours of acoustic recordings were obtained from site M and 7,779 hours of recordings from site N. Data analysis methods consisted of analyst scans of long‐term spectral averages and spectrograms. The data were divided into three frequency bands and each band was analyzed for the sounds of marine mammal species or anthropogenic sources. Representative sounds are presented.

This report summarizes the underwater sounds detected during a series of deployments of a High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) in the southern California (SOCAL) offshore region. The HARP records broadband (10 Hz – 100 kHz) acoustic data, including both marine animal and anthropogenic sound. This report summarizes initial analysis to detect the presence of marine mammals by species as well as the occurrence of naval sonar and other anthropogenic sound events.

This report summarizes data analysis for deployment of a High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) in the southern California (SOCAL) offshore region. The HARP records broadband (10 Hz – 100 kHz) acoustic data, including both marine animal and anthropogenic sound. This report summarizes initial analysis to detect the presence of marine mammals by species as well as the occurrence of naval sonar and other anthropogenic sound events.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted using High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) deployed in waters offshore of Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida with support from the US Navy during 2016 - 2017. The HARPs recorded underwater sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz. Data analysis consisted of analyst scans of long-term spectral averages (LTSAs) and spectrograms, and automated computer algorithm detection when possible. Three frequency bands were analyzed for marine mammal vocalizations and anthropogenic sounds: (1) Lowfrequency, between 10-1000 Hz, (2) Mid-frequency, between 1,000-5,000 Hz, and (3) Highfrequency, between 1-100 kHz.

This report summarizes data analysis for deployment of a High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) in the southern California (SOCAL) offshore region. The HARP records broadband (10 Hz – 100 kHz) acoustic data, including both marine animal and anthropogenic sound. This report summarizes initial analysis to detect the presence of marine mammals by species as well as the occurrence of naval sonar and other anthropogenic sound events.

This report summarizes the underwater sounds detected during a series of deployments of a High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) in the southern California (SOCAL) offshore region. The HARP records broadband (10 Hz – 100 kHz) acoustic data, including both marine animal and anthropogenic sound. This report summarizes initial analysis to detect the presence of marine mammals by species as well as the occurrence of naval sonar and other anthropogenic sound events.

The Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center’s (PIFSC) Cetacean Research Program (CRP) has been conducting visual surveys for cetaceans in the waters surrounding Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) and collecting long-term passive acoustic monitoring data at two sites in CNMI as part of an ongoing effort to develop a record of cetacean occurrence in the region. Visual surveys, conducted aboard small boats (7.6 – 12.2 m), have been ongoing since 2010 off the southern Mariana Islands of Guam, Rota, Saipan, Tinian, and Aguijan. T

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between July 2010 and June 2011 in Onslow Bay at Site A in 171 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 216 days between 30 July 2010 and 3 March 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, North Atlantic right whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between October 2012 and August 2013 in Onslow Bay at Site E in 853 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 250 days between 24 October 2012 and 30 June 2013. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified odontocetes and mysticetes were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between February and July 2011 in the Jacksonville, FL, survey area at Site A in 91 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 164 days between 1 February 2011 and 14 July 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Vocalizations of Risso’s dolphins and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data. Much of the low- and mid-frequency data were unusable, thus preventing detection of mysticete calls and mid-frequency active sonar.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between February and July 2011 in the Jacksonville, FL, survey area at Site B in 37 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 163 days between 2 February 2011 and 14 July 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of humpback whales and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between March and October 2012 in the Cape Hatteras survey area at Site A in approximately 950 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 28 days between 15 March 2012 and 11 April 2012. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of fin whales, minke whales, beaked whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between October 2007 and May 2008 in Onslow Bay at Site A in 162 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes, with the exception of the period from January 1 – 16, 2008, when it recorded continuously due to an instrumentation malfunction, and recorded for 98 days between 10 October 2007 and 16 January 2008. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between May and November 2008 in Onslow Bay at Site B in 232 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 103 days between 30 May 2008 and 10 September 2008. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Vocalizations of blue whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between April and September 2009 in Onslow Bay at Site A in 174 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 107 days between 24 April 2009 and 9 August 2009. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Vocalizations of Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between November 2009 and February 2010 in Onslow Bay at Site A in 171 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 108 days between 8 November 2009 and 24 February 2010. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between November 2009 and April 2010 in Onslow Bay at Site C in 335 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 163 days between 8 November 2009 and 20 April 2010. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, humpback whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between July 2010 and February 2011 in Onslow Bay at Site D in 338 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 210 days between 30 July 2010 and 24 February 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified odontocetes were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between August 2011 and July 2012 in Onslow Bay at Site E in 952 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 105 days between 19 August 2011 and 1 December 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, an unidentified beaked whale species, Blainville’s beaked whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, killer whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between July and October 2012 in Onslow Bay at Site E in 914 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 81 days between 14 July 2012 and 2 October 2012. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

The primary objectives of the passive acoustic 26 monitoring program are to: 1) Determine the patterns of occurrence at each monitoring site; 2) Compare patterns of occurrence to better understand distributional patterns; and 3) Document species-specific characteristics of the vocalizations of marine mammal species 30 in each area.